Showing posts with label critical research.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label critical research.. Show all posts

Thursday, 10 January 2008

Critical Research

If you do not have a submission form for your exam notes you need to see me asap! Some of you were absent for the masterclass when we filled them out.

Click here for longroad media's guide to filling out the form.

Click here for some suggestions about how to tackle Question 2.



KW/DW

Monday, 7 January 2008

Welcome Back!

I hope you all had a happy and well deserved Christmas break! Now for the horrible bit - I need to see ALL of your Critical Research notes completed by the end of this week, no excuses!
If you don't run them by either Mr White or myself, I will seriously consider withdrawing you from the exam because you will be very unprepared! I have also checked your blogs and the majority of you need to update!

KW

Monday, 17 September 2007

Critical research advice.



Critical Research: Examiner Advice
The points below are taken from the overall report by examiners of media studies so they’re definitely worth paying close attention to! They are all specifically about the critical research unit.

Generally answered well however the following points were noticeable:
• Many candidates spent valuable time writing up to two sides explaining why they chose the topic and their focus area. Limited marks can be gained from this.
• While it was pleasing to see more reflection and evaluation in most candidates’ work, this was often very general and not specific to actual methods or sources that the candidate had used. Many candidates had not been taught the difference between reflection and evaluation.
• Many candidates did not reference their sources but talked generally about newspapers, websites & books.
• Some candidates explained and evaluated a range of methods, but cited only one source for each. A range of sources, where possible, should be cited.
• Explanation of logistic was often unclear. Phrases such as ‘I stumbled across..’ or ‘I was lucky to bump into..’ suggest a haphazard, rather than a logical and well planned, approach.
• There was an increased use of observation as a primary method and this was rarely appropriate, and often simply anecdotal, for example - ‘I observed that a lot of the people I know who do drugs listen to hip hop’.
• When addressing their sources, very few candidates really understand the difference between bias and balance.

Click on the title for Misbourne Critical research links.